Re: Wimpy Roots

On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:04:37 -0000 "Michael Roberts"
<michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk> writes:
> Now here is a question for Bill
>
> Why does the Flood model explain the whole range of strata better than
the
> conventional geological ideas of the succession of strata in the
geological
> column?

I don't think I said it does. Where did you see me say that?
 
> Some say the column is all wrong as it is based on a circular argument
from
> Evolution (H Morris among many others). Is this right?

I doubt it.
 
> Or order of fossils explained by the relative mobility of victims of
the flood.
>
> there are two things you need to do, Bill
>
> 1. Say why the conventional column - order and/or dates is wrong

I didn't say it is wrong, did I?
 
> 2. Provide a coherent alternative.

An alternative to what I didn't say?
 
> Do so and I will eat all my fossils and become a YEC.
>
> And if you cant will you join us apostates?

Can't see any future in that.

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Received on Tue Mar 9 00:13:05 2004