>>Lewis’ argument is that same that any sane reader of Scripture would
arrive at>>
Your claim, then, is that anyone who does not agree with you is insane?
Come on, Moorad.
>>If you claim that there are all sorts of possibilities,
then you are indicating that Scripture is untrue,
and so Jesus is not the Son of God. >>
That may be my candidate for the worst syllogism of the year.
I claim only that, from a purely logical viewpoint, there are other
possibilities.
To make that claim says 0 about scripture; it is a statement about an
argument.
Of course, from a logical viewpoint, Jesus' position as the Son of God is
unaffected by whether scripture happens to be:
(1) inerrant
(2) infallible but not inerrant
(3) fairly accurate
(4) a fairy story
Merry Christmas, Moorad.
Burgy
www.burgy.50megs.com/shadows.htm (Into the Shadows)
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Received on Sun Dec 21 13:04:38 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Dec 21 2003 - 13:05:58 EST