Re: Wells and Molecular Phylogenies

From: allenroy (allenroy@peoplepc.com)
Date: Wed Oct 29 2003 - 01:38:45 EST

  • Next message: allenroy: "Re: RATE"

    "D. F. Siemens, Jr." wrote:

    > > Creation, Evolution and the Molecular Revolution
    > > by Kevin L. Anderson, Ph.D.*
    >
    > This braying jackass refuses to recognize that bacterial and viral genes
    > have been incorporated in most genomes by transfer. It has nothing to do
    > with descent. I find it hard to believe that anyone with even the most
    > rudimentary familiarity with the literature would make a statement like
    > Anderson's. I conclude that such falsehood must be deliberate.

    I contacted the "braying Jackass" about bacterial and viral genes being
    incorporated into genomes. Here is his response:

    "As for the comment about these genes not resulting from common
    descent, I could
    not agree more. However, there are a number evolutionary
    scientists, including
    one of the leaders of the DOE's genome project, that are saying exactly that --
    the presence of these genes in the human genome is evidence of common descent
    (ex. see Nature. 2001. 411:940; Science. 2001. 292:1903). Perhaps you would
    want to contact these various evolutionists and explain to them their
    incredible
    ignorance.

    "Yes, some evolutionists do insist such HGT between bacteria and
    humans occurred
    recently (ex. TIG. 2001. 17:235). But, they have no explanation of how this
    happened, only speculation. Therefore, would you please provide even one
    demonstrated means by which bacterial genes can be incorporated into the human
    gene line. This information is apparently widely and thoroughly known so you
    should have no problem quickly providing such information. This "braying
    jackass" is always anxious to learn new information.

    "Kevin



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 30 2003 - 18:25:45 EST