From: bpayne15@juno.com
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 21:50:49 EDT
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:01:08 -0400 Dick Fischer
<dickfischer@earthlink.net> writes:
[Bill wrote:] According to Scripture, God is reponsible for it all, and
ultimately it will all be shown to be good.
If that was true, then we should stop developing cures since we are
obviously thwarting God's will. You could apply that same principle to
infectious diseases which, since God allowed us to catch them, He
apparently wants us to have them, so we should let them run their course,
and if we die then God must prefer us dead. Is this a philosophy you
subscribe to?
There you go Dick; if you lust after multiple women then, since God
allowed you to lust He apparently wants you to lust. Don't fight it,
just let everything run its course and then blame it on God.
Exodus 4:11: "Who gives speech to mortals? Who makes them mute or deaf,
seeing or blind? Is it not I, the Lord?"
Dick said: The problem, as I see it, is that ID is predicated on
positive alterations. If they wish to credit the Creator directly for
Huntington's Disease, etc., then how "intelligent" is that?
Since God says He makes people mute, deaf, seeing or blind, then by what
criteria do you make exceptions for Huntington's diseae, etc.? It would
be really nice if you would defend your position with Scripture this
time.
Bill
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 15 2003 - 21:57:11 EDT