Re: Phillip Johnson (and Methodological Naturalism)

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 21:33:00 EDT

  • Next message: bpayne15@juno.com: "Re: Genetic Blunders"

    Brian Harper wrote:

    > At 09:46 PM 10/14/2003 -0400, Walter Hicks
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    >> So would you have me believe that there is one
    >> for evolution, or you trying to say that there
    >> is not a theory that that works for
    >> evolution? Which is your claim? I can settle
    >> for either answer.
    >>
    >
    >
    > There is no theory of evolution that I know of
    > that can do what you are demanding of it. This
    > was part of my point. Evolution is much more
    > complicated than plasticity. Should you expect
    > more from evolutionary theorists?
    >

    No and that is all that I wanted to know.
    Sorry if I misunderstood.

    Thanks.

    Walt

    ===================================
    Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>

    In any consistent theory, there must
    exist true but not provable statements.
    (Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic
    If you have already found the truth
    without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    ===================================

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 15 2003 - 21:35:18 EDT