From: Josh Bembenek (jbembe@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Oct 09 2003 - 11:26:50 EDT
> GRM: Of course we might be wrong. But have you ever tried to get a
>young-earther to acknowledge an error of fact? I was told when I was a YEC
>that overthrusts didn't exist. They do. I was told that the vapor canopy
>would provide a warm environment for life before the flood. The truth is
>it
>would be Venus like warmth. (see http://home.entouch.net/dmd/canopy.htm.
>You
>should have seen the reaction to the article I published in CRSQ which
>criticized the canopy. I was actually told that fossil webbed bird
>footprints found in the Green river formation could not be animal tracks.
>If you want, I can send you the picture.
I am happy to see that AiG provides a weblink of "arguments that should not
be used anymore."
http://www.answersingenesis.org/Home/Area/faq/dont_use.asp
Canopy theory is placed under the strongly discouraged but not completely
disproven category. Others are listed as completely refuted.
This is a significant step in the right direction, lets try to acknowledge
that!
Josh
_________________________________________________________________
Share your photos without swamping your Inbox. Get Hotmail Extra Storage
today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 09 2003 - 11:27:01 EDT