Re: RATE

From: Jay Willingham (jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 15:53:06 EDT

  • Next message: Stephen J. Krogh, P.G.: "RE: RATE"

    Say the flood occurred before Pangea was broken up in Peleg's time. And say
    there has been recent evidence of accelerated evolutionary processes in New
    World finches, why is this a difficulty?

    Are there no fossils of the New World opossum's progenitors?

    Jay Willingham

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Walter Hicks" <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    To: "Ted Davis" <TDavis@messiah.edu>
    Cc: <asa@calvin.edu>; <hvantill@chartermi.net>; <jbembe@hotmail.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 2:45 PM
    Subject: Re: RATE

    >
    >
    > Ted Davis wrote:
    >
    > > I really have little to offer on this age of the earth conversation,
    it's so
    > > settled in my mind that it would be almost impossible for me to consider
    a
    > > "young" earth position--probably as difficult as it would be for me to
    > > consider a geocentric position. However, I think it interesting and
    > > instructive to quote from Bernard Ramm's The Christian View of Science
    and
    > > Scripture (1954, citing my copy of the 1962 printing).
    > >
    > > The context is Ramm's discussion of geology, the immediate context his
    > > discussion of George McCready Price's "flood geology" view--which had
    been
    > > endorsed more or less by several evangelical scientists and biblical
    > > scholars in the mid-twentieth century. Price had been willing to accept
    at
    > > least the possibility of an old universe and solar system, but not old
    forms
    > > of life. The view he supported is now essentially that of "scientific
    > > creationism," namely that living things were created separately on six
    > > literal days just a few thousand years ago; and that the biblical flood
    had
    > > been responsible for producing all or nearly all fossiliferous rock.
    > >
    > > I think what Ramm said then, is still applicable (pp. 181-2):
    > > "What geologists have spread out over three billion years all took place
    > > during a flood of little more than a year's duration. Somebody is very
    > > sadly mistaken if the range of possibilities is from one year to three
    > > billion years. [paragraph] The so-called strength of Price's work is
    his
    > > effort to poke holes into the uniformitarian geology of Lyell as it is
    > > taught in standard books on geology. We must be careful of a logical
    > > fallacy at this point. To show the logical fallacies of another theory
    does
    > > not automatically prove ours to be right. ... Suppose that 80 per cent
    of
    > > the geologic record makes clear sense when interpreted from the Lyellian
    > > point of view, and that 20 per cent remains a problem for uniformitarian
    > > geology. We have our choice of taking the 80 per cent as established
    and
    > > going to work on the 20 per cent; or, of taking the 20 per cent as
    > > normative, and trying to dissolve the 80 per cent. Price adopts the
    latter
    > > procedure. The author does not know what the actual percentages are,
    but he
    > > is sure that he is generous to Price in the choice of the above
    percentages.
    > > If by analogy Price's principle were followed *in other sciences* it is
    > > obvious that chaos would resut. ... Price is popular for one reason
    > > alone--that he has stridden forth like David to meet the Goliath of
    modern
    > > uniformitarian geology and that even though the giant has not fallen
    Price
    > > has been slinging his smooth stones for more than forty years."
    > >
    > > ted
    >
    > I think that a greater concern for a world wide flood is not as much the
    fossil
    > record as is the living record in Australia. There are animals there that
    are
    > not found anywhere else in the world. How can this be explained by a
    universal
    > flood around 5000 years ago? Did the kangaroos hop & swim from Ararat to
    > Australia. Also there are marsupial fossils in Australia and nowhere else.
    What
    > sort of coherent story can be generated for all of this?
    >
    >
    > Walt
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > ===================================
    > Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
    >
    > In any consistent theory, there must
    > exist true but not provable statements.
    > (Godel's Theorem)
    >
    > You can only find the truth with logic
    > If you have already found the truth
    > without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    > ===================================
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 08 2003 - 15:54:04 EDT