Re: Original Sin (was Re: RATE)

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Tue Oct 07 2003 - 07:56:47 EDT

  • Next message: George Murphy: "Re: Original Sin (was Re: RATE)"

    In a message dated 10/7/03 4:15:56 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
    dfwinterstein@msn.com writes:

    > How about a simultaneous reevaluation of the inextricably related doctrines
    > of atonement? Does anyone really understand how atonement works? The NT
    > refers to atonement as a payment, a ransom for sin. And Hebrews 10:22 says,
    > "...Without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness." So is God really
    > bloodthirsty? And who actually got that payment? Was God paying himself?
    >
    >

    Atonement comes via the self sacrifice. That is the core religious belief in
    every major religion since the Vedas.
    God gave man free will so that man could freely and without reservation (as
    Christ did) give his self back to God.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Oct 07 2003 - 07:57:16 EDT