Re: RATE

From: Josh Bembenek (jbembe@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 10:01:30 EDT

  • Next message: Dr. Blake Nelson: "Original Sin (was Re: RATE)"

    >At the moment I am choosing not to participate in the argumentation
    >concerning specific cataclysmic interpretations of empirical data, but I
    >would be interested to hear your testimony concerning why holding to a YEC
    >position is so important to you. What is at stake here? If the professional
    >science community turns out to be correct on matters of chronology, what
    >would be the loss to the Christian faith as you understand it?

    Howard, from what I've come to understand the primary importance is being
    able to claim that mankind is fallen and that has been inherited from Adam
    and Eve. In this view, The Fall requires some kind of mechanistic transfer
    into all of humankind from Adam, otherwise we had no fall. This is
    partially bolstered by the idea that God looked at His creation and called
    it "good." Would the creation of hominids that die, have disease, etc. and
    are inherently fallen creatures be "good?"

    This is an interesting question.

    Josh

    _________________________________________________________________
    Share your photos without swamping your Inbox. Get Hotmail Extra Storage
    today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 10:01:44 EDT