From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Sun Oct 05 2003 - 21:44:39 EDT
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
>Behalf Of allenroy
>Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 8:05 PM
>To me, isometric dating is pure fairy tale based on some of the
>evidence I've
>given already. By chemical composition I was primarily discussing
>differences
>in ratios of isotopes. I don't believe that would change much the overall
>chemical composition of the island chains
And it works based upon the evidence I gave on the Hawaiian islands. you
didn't explain why the radioactive dating matches the topography of the
islands. Changing isotopes shouldn't affect the wearing down of the
islands. Explain that.
>
>> I simply do not have the time to spend hours or days producing
>the argument
>> needed when we all know that Allen simply will deny it, on some totally
>> incoherent argument.
>
>Incoherency is in the eyes of the beholder.
Not hardly. the above statement sounds like you don't accept the existence
of objective truth. are you a relativist? do you believe truth is relative?
When you explain why the isotopes change with a lowering of topography (or
raising depending on the direction one looks), then you have the beginnings
of a coherent theory.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 05 2003 - 21:44:55 EDT