Re: RATE

From: D. F. Siemens, Jr. (dfsiemensjr@juno.com)
Date: Sun Oct 05 2003 - 18:53:39 EDT

  • Next message: allenroy: "Re: RATE"

    Darryl,
    I understand the problem. I recently got a letter from a brother saying,
    "I find no definitive Bible that we CAN accept as inerrant.... they never
    identify the inerrant Bible they do accept nor do they make any effort
    (as far as I know) to give evidence for what they believe IS the credible
    portion of God's Word." He was upset about cutting out the coneys and
    hares, mistakenly identified as ruminants. The answer to the problem is
    really simple if we go back to the Reformers rather than the
    Fundamentalists. The confessions and catechisms that mention scripture
    specify that they are inerrant in matters of faith and morals, what we
    need to believe in order to be saved and how we need to behave in order
    to honor God. Even Augustine, a millennium earlier, did not believe in a
    patty cake man given breath.

    If we take Paul's declaration (II Timothy 3:16) of the purposes of ALL
    scripture, we ought to come to the conclusion of the reformers: all
    scripture is the inspired Word of God intended to lead us to trust and
    obey him, with no fear of going astray, but it does not lead us into
    other areas of truth.
    Dave

    On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 15:55:04 -0500 "Darryl Maddox" <dpmaddox@arn.net>
    writes:
    Glenn you know I agree with you most of the time and I don't disagree
    with you here, but I do have a question and an opinion.

    Q: If we through out a 6 day creation and a universal flood, by what
    criteria do we stop throwing out stuff?

    I've been trying to answer this one objectively for most of my life and
    have yet to even get close to an answer but that doesn't mean it hasn't
    been done or won't be done. But if it has I am not aware of it and that
    leads to my opinion -

    Opinion: My opinion is that it is the fear that the lack of such a
    hard-and-fast, publishable, debated and agreed upon by all, criteria for
    separating analogy from fact that causes most YECs to stay that way
    inspite of everything. Once they start throwing out stuff they are
    afraid they won't know how or where to stop and that could leave them
    with consequences they would rather not face. The fact that they
    compromise, select for acceptance, and ignore as irrelevant passages on
    other issues is a small and seldom thought of contradiction to their
    stance on the age of the earth and the nature of the flood so they try to
    stand pat on the big ones and hope the small ones will take care of
    themselves eventually.

    Darryl
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Glenn Morton
    To: Dawsonzhu@aol.com ; asa@calvin.edu
    Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 10:03 AM
    Subject: RE: RATE

    Hi Wayne, you wrote:
    -----Original Message-----
    From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
    Behalf Of Dawsonzhu@aol.com
    Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 8:20 AM

     Wayne: What I don't quite understand about YEC folk is that even at that
    time,
    with all the raging hormonal processes and rebel-without-a-cause matters
    of adolescence, I knew deep in my heart-of-hearts that God actually
    could have equally created through evolution. I sometimes used it to
    shut Christians out with "the buzzword", but I could not run away from
    that thought in the back of my mind.

    GRM: I too had that same feeling when I was a YEC. I knew deep down that
    the position I was publishing on was in deep trouble. Yet I continued
    because I believed! I suspect lots of YECs are just like that. And I
    didn't want to beleive that my fellow christians would fill my head with
    mush. Christians are supposed to be honest in all their dealings.

     Wayne: Is it that some people just simply don't even want to consider
    examining any other possibilities than a 6000 year old earth? Is it that
    they
    just want to be left alone and don't want to be challenged to think? Is
    it fear
    of facing oneself and doubt? I can understand doubt, but this level of
    denial is hard for me to understand.

    GRM: The fear is that if one accepts evolution you have to accept that
    the Bible is false! That last statement will get the hackles of the
    old-earthers up! But before the complaints and defenses come in, hear me
    out. YEC leaders constantly tell these people that if evolution is true,
    then the Bible is false. They are programmed to follow that line of
    reasoning and thus when faced with obvious data that doesn't fit or
    flatly contradicts their viewpoint, they look into the precipice and see
    atheism. And they recoil. That programming is why I have struggled with
    these issues for years.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Oct 05 2003 - 18:56:11 EDT