From: John W Burgeson (jwburgeson@juno.com)
Date: Sat Oct 04 2003 - 11:51:40 EDT
Robert wrote: "While the rhetoric appears to be very strong with this new
work and will likely be even more effective with the masses, I would
imagine that the strategy could potentially be quite devastating to
creation science if they are shown to be clearly wrong. "
I hope so, but I'm not hopeful. They used (1) moon dust and (2) Paluxy
footprints and (3) declining magnetic earth's field arguments very
strongly back in the 60s and 70s and when they were discredited, they did
not appear to lose any strength. People have short memories and there is
always a new crop of naive young people coming along who are easily
swayed by snake oil.
I appreciated your comments. Saving them. Thanks.
Burgy
www.burgy.50megs.com
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2003 - 11:56:53 EDT