From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 21:13:51 EDT
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
>Behalf Of Howard J. Van Till
>Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 2:38 PM
>>From: "Richard McGough" <richard@biblewheel.com>
>
>> But it is
>> fascinating that [Glenn] went on to say that "ID-biogenesis
>deduces God/THE
>> DESIGNER from observational data--design, information, structure...." Do
>> you agree with this? Is ID-biogenesis based on scientific
>observations, as
>> stated by Glen Morton?
>
>Glenn is free to clarify or comment on his own statement.
If I were to be more careful I would have said, ID *tries* to deduce. The
rest of my original comment, which wasn't requoted, goes on to note that we
can't rule out little green men as the creator. Thus I would agree with
Howard's point 5. I find ID logically worse than useless.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 21:14:05 EDT