Re: homosexuality & holy war (was Re: Sin?)

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 20:18:36 EDT

  • Next message: richard@biblewheel.com: "Re: Sin?"

    RFaussette@aol.com wrote:
    >
    > In a message dated 7/23/03 4:20:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time, gmurphy@raex.com
    > writes:
    >
    > > It occurred to me after sending a recent post, an excerpt of which is
    > > below,
    > > that there is a fairly clear way of making the necessary distinction between
    > > biology &
    > > theology. The directions in the OT for the extermination of non-Israelite
    > > populations
    > > represent one way of guarding against "contamination" of a group's gene pool
    > > & thus
    > > improving the chances for reproductive success & survival for that group.
    > > Yet such
    > > tactics are profoundly inconsistent with the later development of Judaism &
    > > with
    > > Christian theology & ethics.
    > >
    >
    > What later development of Judaism are you talking about? And keep in mind,
    > reformed and conservative Jews are a recent phenomenon, until the French
    > revolution they were all orthodox. Reference your later development, because your
    > argument rests on one.
    >
    > I have to say, however, you're beginning to see the light.
    >
    > I don't suppose you realize that the perimeter of the Temple has to be
    > cleared on non-Jews? I don't suppose you see the ethnic cleansing of the
    > Palestinians going on? We have 'gets' and 'eruvs' established in Brooklyn and Bergen
    > county, NJ. That's for separation.
    >
    > "Profoundly inconsistent" is a strong statement. It's got to rest on
    > something. Where's the data for the later development of Judaism?
    >
    > The Hasidic renewal of the baal shem tov revitalized orthodox Judaism and
    > laid the base for zionism which is now the religious agenda holding the entire
    > world hostage, even many fundamentalist christians. Read Real Jews by Noah Efron.
    >
    > rich faussette
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > In a message dated 7/23/03 4:20:34 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    > gmurphy@raex.com writes:
    >
    > It occurred to me after sending a recent post, an excerpt of
    > which is below,
    > that there is a fairly clear way of making the necessary
    > distinction between biology &
    > theology. The directions in the OT for the extermination of
    > non-Israelite populations
    > represent one way of guarding against "contamination" of a
    > group's gene pool & thus
    > improving the chances for reproductive success & survival
    > for that group. Yet such
    > tactics are profoundly inconsistent with the later
    > development of Judaism & with
    > Christian theology & ethics.
    >
    >
    > What later development of Judaism are you talking about? And keep in
    > mind, reformed and conservative Jews are a recent phenomenon, until
    > the French revolution they were all orthodox. Reference your later
    > development, because your argument rests on one.
    >
    > I have to say, however, you're beginning to see the light.
    >
    > I don't suppose you realize that the perimeter of the Temple has to be
    > cleared on non-Jews? I don't suppose you see the ethnic cleansing of
    > the Palestinians going on? We have 'gets' and 'eruvs' established in
    > Brooklyn and Bergen county, NJ. That's for separation.
    >
    > "Profoundly inconsistent" is a strong statement. It's got to rest on
    > something. Where's the data for the later development of Judaism?
    >
    > The Hasidic renewal of the baal shem tov revitalized orthodox Judaism
    > and laid the base for zionism which is now the religious agenda
    > holding the entire world hostage, even many fundamentalist christians.
    > Read Real Jews by Noah Efron.

            Talk about straining out a gnat but swallowing a camel! You immediately zeroed
    in on the phrase "the later development of Judaism" which was not essential to my
    argument & missed the whole point of what I was trying to say. What I was referring to
    was OT passages like those Paul quotes in Romans 15:9-12 & the strong Jewish efforts at
    proselytizing before & in Jesus' time (cf. Mt. 23:15) whose benefits the early Christian
    mission partly reaped.
            But I don't intend to argue that. Try reading what I wrote with omission of the
    phrase that got you excited. You probably won't agree with it but at least you'll know
    what I said.

                                                    Shalom,
                                                    George
                                                    

                                                            

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 20:18:34 EDT