Re: Sin?

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 14:40:17 EDT

  • Next message: richard@biblewheel.com: "Re: Cambrian Explosion"

    John W Burgeson wrote:
    >
    > George wrote, in part: "Perhaps I've misread you. Let's see. I think
    > there are basically 3 ways one
    > can argue that Paul's statements in Rom.1:26-27 do not condemn as sinful
    > all homosexual
    > activity.
    > A) Paul was just wrong & there's nothing at all wrong with such
    > activity. I
    > don't hear anyone on the list saying this.
    > B) Paul's statements refer to manifestly wicked people & not to decent
    > ones.
    > C) Paul is speaking here about various types of promiscuous
    > homosexuality & not
    > committed, loving, 1-1 homosexual relationships between adults, in part
    > because he (&
    > people in his culture in general ) were not aware that some people, apart
    > from any
    > choice they made, had homosexual orientations.
    >
    > You - & many others - have argued for C. But the way you spoke in your
    > earlier
    > post about your friends sounded a lot like B."
    >
    > In a later post you argued that Paul had in mind gentiles in general and
    > not a particular group and that, of course, not every gentile was guilty
    > of every one of the sins listed.
    >
    > I had always thought Paul had in mind one particular group of gentiles.
    > >From the context, I don't know how to resolve this with certainty. I
    > understand your argument that Paul was speaking of "gentiles in general."
    >
    > In any case, I have been arguing B, as well as for C, of course. The
    > people I know are (mostly) Christians; a couple are Unitarians. And my
    > argument is that they don't fit the description Paul gives. Not even
    > close.

            Though I think that Paul is speaking of gentiles in general here, let's pursue
    possibility B, that he's referring to some manifestly bad subset of them. Consider one
    member X of that subset who lies, cheats, steals and also engages in homosexual activity
    with a single partner in a long-term relationship. According to this interpretation of
    Romans we can & should consider all of these things as sinful. Now suppose this person
    has a dramatic conversion experience and comes to talk to me (M). The following
    converstion might ensue.
            X "I'm sorry for my sins, believe in Jesus Christ as my savior and want to
            start living as a Christian. What kind of changes should I make?"
            M "To start with, you should stop lying, cheating and stealing."
            X "What about my homosexual relationship? I was told before that that was
            sinful too."
            M "It was then, but it's OK now."
    This seems kind of odd to me.

                                                            Shalom,
                                                            George
              

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 15:16:52 EDT