Scientific concordism in another context

From: Joel Cannon (jcannon@jcannon.washjeff.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 14:07:02 EDT

  • Next message: Robert Schneider: "Re: Predetermination: God's controlling will?"

    I just finished reading an interesting Scientific American article on
    Lev Landau, one of the most significant physicists of the 20th
    century (August 1997).

    Interestingly, when beta decay was discovered in the late 1920's
    Landau supported Neils Bohr in his idea that the experiment violated
    conservation of energy. He changed his mind fairly quickly (eventually
    the neutrino was discovered to be what carried away the `lost' energy).

    What is interesting is that Landau, a dedicated socialist at the time,
    was persecuted by socialist writers because of this view.
    "Unfortunately, the co-founder of Marxism, Friedrich Engels, had
    declared in the 19th century that the law of conservation of energy
    was to be forever fundamental to science, and Landau was severely
    castigated in the local papers for his (temporary) blasphemy."

    Apparently others besides Christians are (or were) convinced that
    their "scriptures," despite being written for an entirely different
    purpose, communicate scientific descriptions which set borders around
    what scientists can think and not think.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Joel W. Cannon | (724)223-6146
    Physics Department | jcannon@washjeff.edu
    Washington and Jefferson College |
    Washington, PA 15301 |
                                         
                        



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 13:51:10 EDT