From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 13:34:35 EDT
In a message dated 7/10/03 10:51:29 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
gmurphy@raex.com writes:
> My own view at this point is an intermediate one which, I fear, will
> satisfy
> very few. Homosexuality is not part of God's basic intention for creation
> but, for
> various reasons, it is a reality that some persons do have a fundamental
> homosexual
> orientation that they have not chosen. The best way for both church and
> state to deal
> with this is to recognize (though perhaps in different ways) the legitimacy
> and legal
> status of committed 1-1 homosexual relationships, though they would not be
> considered
> "marriage."
>
> Shalom,
> George
>
>
>
>
>
Actually, George, your position is a reasonable one. The underlying motive
in my arguments is to protect the sanctity of marriage in order to protect the
primacy of procreation, not to undermine the rights of committed
neuroendocrine determined homosexuals. I would however, still insist, that committed
homosexual marriage, does not confer the religiosity of a committed procreating
heterosexual marriage, nor do I believe that homosexual culture should be media
broadcast as it is beginning to be to our children conducing them to
opportunistic homosexuality rather than neuroendocrine driven homosexuality
(homosexuality nurtured from without via propaganda rather than intrinsically, hormonally
and thus inescapably natured from within). It is believed only a small subset
of homosexuals are hormonally/genetically driven. (paper available on request)
what is happening now is that children are being taught about homosexuality
in the schools and it is presented as a viable life style conducing
heterosexuals who are not neuroendocrinally motivated to mimic the taught behaviors. That
is leading our children away from God and toward a 'chosen' life style of
homosexuality, something they could easily avoid if it was not 'taught' in the
schools.
homosexuals are not deferring in this regard - they are fighting for and
getting equality with heterosexual marriage.
rich faussette
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 13:34:56 EDT