Re: MWH experimental test

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 20:28:17 EDT

  • Next message: Graham E. Morbey: "[Fwd: Note to Svend Robinson]"

    Glenn Morton wrote:
    >
    > I can accept and fully agree with the idea that actually nothing is ever
    > proven in science. All that is done is manipulate the probability. For me,
    > if this experiment, which I do believe will be attemped in the next 25
    > years, succeeds, the probability for an MWH will go way up. Even so, if
    > Deutsch succeeds, the popular culture will elevate MWH to a new icon of
    > science. In any event, whether proven, not proven or only probable, a
    > successful test will mean we Christians will have to deal with the issue.
    > Like it or not. And that is why I don't think we can ignore the issue. My
    > money is that it will succeed only based upon the fact that very few
    > scientific things Christians have said couldn't be so, actually ended up
    > that way. We seem to always back the wrong scientific horse.

            I agree with Glenn about the tendency that he notes at the end - though the
    problem is often not so much one of backing the wrong scientific horse as of not even
    bothering to go to the scientific track. I.e., the church & its theologians have too
    often been uninterested in science until some new scientific development comes about
    that calls for theological assessment - & then the church is of course unprepared.

            A few qualifications though. First, scientific development has not always been
    simply a problem for Christian theology. While the physics of the 20th century
    certainly introduced some challenges (like MWI), relativity, QM & chaos theory also got
    rid of some prior concepts, like the clockwork universe, that were problems for
    theology.

            Secondly, the science-theology dialogue has developed over the past ~25 years to
    the point that there are a number people who have some competence in both science &
    theology who are wrestling both with current issues & with those that are on the
    horizon. So while we may not have all the answers for new developments, we're not so
    likely to be blindsided.

            & as a very small token of that, let me mention again the paper I gave at the
    '87 asa meeting, "Parallel Worlds, Quantum Theory, and Divine Sovereignty." I don't
    have a e-copy (it was pre-word processor) but would be happy to send a copy by snailmail
    to anyone who wants it & gives me an address.

                                                            Shalom,
                                                            George

    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 20:28:52 EDT