Re: the struggle for gay rights

From: John W Burgeson (jwburgeson@juno.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 10:39:30 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Sin?"

    Rich wrote, in part: " Religion involves absolutes. The purpose of the
    Levitical prohibitions is to preserve the continuity of the family from
    generation to generation. All behaviors which promote family cohesion and
    reproduction are observed, those that do not are condemned."

    I understand, Rich, where you are coming from. You have decided, I assume
    on the basis of your own serious study, that the Levitical laws
    necessarily apply to you. And so you have built your theology on that
    basis, and argue that others ought to do so also.

    With this understanding, what you write above (and elsewhere) is
    consistent.

    I, and most others on this list, have concluded, and you need to assume
    that we have done so on the basis of our own serious study, that the
    Levitical laws* do not all apply to us. We may be wrong. But so far I
    have not seen any persuasive arguments that suggests we are wrong.

    Peace.

    John Burgeson (Burgy)

    * eating pork, embracing our wife after childbirth, presenting our
    disobedient child for public stoning, etc. are a few of these which seem
    problematical.

    www.burgy.50megs.com

    ________________________________________________________________
    The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
    Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
    Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 11:09:34 EDT