From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 20:06:02 EDT
RFaussette@aol.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/6/03 6:16:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> jbembe@hotmail.com writes:
>
> > I think this is the core of the question. Is the act of homosexuality a
> > conditional sin, or always sin? The bible forbids murder, but killing men
> > is not an absolute sin, in the condition of war or self defence it is not
> > morally wrong. The real question is whether other "sins" like homosexuality
> > depend on certain conditions. I would not be on the side of advising people
> > to engage in homosexuality under any condition. Luckily the bible informs
> > us that God is a fair and righteous judge.
> >
> >
> >
>
> "You must be fruitful and increase, swarm throughout the earth and rule over
> it" genesis 9:7.
>
> If you were to obey that command "religiously," no conditions apply.
> Homosexuality would always be a sin. Once you set conditions, your obedience to that
> command would be conditional and NOT religious, since having sex for the sake
> of sex does not bear fruit.
> My argument is not that homosexuals should be killed or ostracized, as is
> often suggested when I support the religious argument, but simply that it is not
> a religious behavior... end of story.
>
> rich faussette
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> In a message dated 7/6/03 6:16:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> jbembe@hotmail.com writes:
>
> I think this is the core of the question. Is the act of
> homosexuality a
> conditional sin, or always sin? The bible forbids murder,
> but killing men
> is not an absolute sin, in the condition of war or self
> defence it is not
> morally wrong. The real question is whether other "sins"
> like homosexuality
> depend on certain conditions. I would not be on the side of
> advising people
> to engage in homosexuality under any condition. Luckily the
> bible informs
> us that God is a fair and righteous judge.
>
> "You must be fruitful and increase, swarm throughout the earth and
> rule over it" genesis 9:7.
>
> If you were to obey that command "religiously," no conditions apply.
> Homosexuality would always be a sin. Once you set conditions, your
> obedience to that command would be conditional and NOT religious,
> since having sex for the sake of sex does not bear fruit.
> My argument is not that homosexuals should be killed or ostracized, as
> is often suggested when I support the religious argument, but simply
> that it is not a religious behavior... end of story.
If failure to be fruitful & increase is the problem with homosexual activity
then presumably then it is not sinful for a bisexual person to engage in heterosexual
intercourse for reproductive purposes and in homosexual behavior for other reasons.
Shalom,
George
George L. Murphy
gmurphy@raex.com
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 20:05:34 EDT