Re: Sin?  Further thoughts

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 08:30:04 EDT

  • Next message: Dawsonzhu@aol.com: "Re: Probabilities and Protons"

    In a message dated 7/6/03 8:22:04 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
    RDehaan237@aol.com writes:

    > Tell me then, are you thinking in terms of real people with a homosexual
    > orientation who are living in a loving committed relationship? Or are you
    > treating it as a "problem" that can be solved with verses from scripture?
    >
    >

    characterizing the issue (I doubt the greater percentage of homosexual
    relationships are loving and committed. Many of them are primarily visceral and
    transient - that's my take from knowing homosexuals who worked the baths and the
    glory holes in NY) doesn't change the issue. Homosexuality is incompatible with
    a religion that says be fruitful and multiply and can never biologically
    become the ideal for human relationships as it is non-productive.
    Fine, it is not a "problem." But it is not "religious" either.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 08:30:26 EDT