Re: Fwd: "ICONS OF EVOLUTION?" posted at NCSE

• Previous message: Josh Bembenek: "RE: Dembski and Caesar cyphers"
• Maybe in reply to: Dick Fischer: "Fwd: "ICONS OF EVOLUTION?" posted at NCSE"
• Next in thread: bivalve: "Re: Fwd: "ICONS OF EVOLUTION?" posted at NCSE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Far better is to actually read Icons of Evolution and Wells' distortions
will become very apparent. I think Wells should do his homework before
writing and make sure he is honest in his arguments.

As it is Icons runs and runs and causes havoc.

What does Wells think about our Lord and Saviour?

Michael
----- Original Message -----
From: "Josh Bembenek" <jbembe@hotmail.com>
To: <dickfischer@genesisproclaimed.org>; <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2002 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Fwd: "ICONS OF EVOLUTION?" posted at NCSE

>
> One should review the following link before agreeing too deeply with NCSE
> opinions...
>
>
>
http://www.discovery.org/viewDB/index.php3?command=view&id=1292&program=CRSC
%20Responses
>
>
> Gishlick certaintly doesn't seem very unbiased.
>
> Josh
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
>

• Next message: Glenn Morton: "RE: Design detection and minimum description length"
• Previous message: Josh Bembenek: "RE: Dembski and Caesar cyphers"
• Maybe in reply to: Dick Fischer: "Fwd: "ICONS OF EVOLUTION?" posted at NCSE"
• Next in thread: bivalve: "Re: Fwd: "ICONS OF EVOLUTION?" posted at NCSE"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 25 2002 - 11:30:01 EST