RE: Historicity

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 07:42:56 EDT

  • Next message: Jim Eisele: "Re: 969 years?"

    Shuan writes

    >We should probably lay to rest the idea that there is a kind of pure,
    >unretouched version of history out there, except for maybe contemporary
    >history.

    Judging by your recent posts, I infer that you include accurate Biblical
    history as "nonsense."

    I ask the following out of "curiosity" not out of "judgment."

    Have you read the OT? I was fascinated by how, overall, down to earth
    it was.

    Are you aware of archaeological evidence for the flood?

    Do you think God could have inspired the OT writers?

    I'd be very interested in hearing your responses, either on or off-line.

    Jim Eisele
    Genesis in Question
    http://genesisinquestion.org



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 28 2002 - 12:18:26 EDT