Re: Noahic Covenant

From: MikeSatterlee@cs.com
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 20:07:07 EDT

  • Next message: Bill Payne: "Re: Middle East oil supply; alternatives"

    Hello Glenn,

    Thanks for your reply. I always enjoy reading your posts.

    I wrote: If the elevation of Noah's land was temporarily lowered slightly
    (possibly due to a large Meteor impact or series of such impacts) it would
    then have remained flooded until the land regained its original elevation.

    You responded: This suggestion doesn't hold water either. The physics of
    meteor impacts would not allow what you are talking about to occur. To
    depress the lands
    surface, requires the movement of lots of very viscous mantle material.
    ...The only part of the land which would be depressed would be that in the
    immediate area of impact.

    I don't fully understand what you are saying. Are you saying that the impact
    of a meteor which was large enough to create a crater with a diameter of two
    miles could not have triggered a major earthquake, and that such an
    earthquake could not have caused a large area of land just north of the
    Persian Gulf to sink twenty feet (Gen. 7:20), and that if it did that land
    area could not have returned to its previous elevation within a year?

    I wonder if anyone really knows for certain what the effects and
    after-effects of such a large meteor impact might be.

    Mike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 24 2002 - 01:21:08 EDT