Re: Creative spiritual non-fiction (WasHistorical accuracy?)

From: george murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 06:35:45 EDT

  • Next message: J Burgeson: "Responses"

    Robert Schneider wrote:

    > Bob DeHaan writes:
    >
    > > There is a new genre arising among Christian authors called "creative
    > > spiritual nonfiction." It is nonfiction because it has a historical
    > basis;
    > > it is based on fact, not pure imagination. It is creative because it
    > allows
    > > the author to deal with the facts of the case in a creative way, using
    > > his/her imagination. It is spiritual, rather than purely naturalistic, in
    > > that it allows the author to add a spiritual dimension or interpretation
    > to
    > > both facts and imagination.
    > >
    > > The authors of the gospels and other parts of the Bible seemed to have
    > > discovered this genre long before modern Christians writers reinvented it.
    > >
    > > Perhaps all nonscientific writers use the three elements of this genre in
    > > varying proportions.
    > >
    > > Bob
    > >
    > Bob's note has stirred a couple of thoughts. I agree with him entirely
    > that biblical writers combined historical tradition (the factual dimension)
    > with creative imagination and spiritual interpretation, and that this
    > quality of story-telling is universal and perhaps even an "innate"
    > characteristic of human communication. Two OT events come to mind. One is
    > the story of David and Goliath in I Sam. 17. Anyone who has studied
    > literary genres will recognize the numerous folktale elements in the story,
    > and it is these elements that give the story interest and delightfulness and
    > make it memorable.

             I agree with the basic point here: The story is clearly concerned with
    more than just historical report. But there are at least a couple of features
    which, wihile quite possibly historical, are very foreign to our way
    of thinking.

             1) Challenges like those of Goliath and single combat "between the
    armies" was a fairly common feature of battles in the ancient world: This
    particular folktale element has its origin in real happenings of that sort. (&
    even in the 19th century we could note Bill Cody & Yellowhand.) But of course
    it's highly unlikely today.
             2) As presented in Sunday School we think of David as a
    little kid with
    a child's rubberband slingshot. But trained slingers could be a major force in
    ancient armies & could be lethal: The Romans had auxiliaries from the Balearic
    Islands with this skill.

    Shalom,

    George

    George L. Murphy
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
    "The Science-Theology Interface"



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jun 23 2002 - 08:15:14 EDT