Re: Creative spiritual non-fiction (WasHistorical accuracy?)

From: Robert Schneider (rjschn39@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Jun 23 2002 - 14:15:08 EDT

  • Next message: Shuan Rose: "RE: Creative spiritual non-fiction (WasHistorical accuracy?)"

    In his note below, commenting on my references to the story of David and
    Goliath, George Murphy points out that combat between champions to decide a
    battle was "a fairly common feature of battles in the ancient world"
    (particularly in tribal societies), a folktale element that has its origin
    in such historical happenings. And, that slingers were found in some
    ancient armies, such as the Balearic Island auxiliaries in the Roman army,
    who could en mass deliver a battery of injurious and lethal blows.

         I thank George for this contribution, which stirred my memory of a visit
    20 years ago this month to the Valley of Elah in the Shefalah hill country
    of Palestine, the setting of this story. As our tour group walked to the
    dry creek bed that split the valley, I would see the range of hills
    stretching out on either side and imagine the warring armies lined up along
    the ridges and slopes of each, with Goliath striding down one slope to the
    valley floor. Our guide invited us to pick up five smooth stones, and
    having in mind the weight of my suitcase, I picked up stones that were
    probably smaller and lighter than the missles David would have used. A
    stone of good heft in the sling of a practiced slinger could indeed deliver
    the concussion that felled Goliath and rendered him helpless.

         It is probably very difficult to determine to what degree any story like
    this one is historical fact and creative imagination, for the relationship
    and interplay between them is often subtle. Let me offer a few insights in
    this regard from other writers. First, I learned how tenacious a carefully
    cultivated memory in an oral-aural culture, such as that of early Israel,
    can be, from writer Alex Haley. Shortly before he published _Roots_, Haley
    held a Berea College audience spellbound for nearly two hours as he told the
    story of finding his family's roots and the village of his ancester Kunta
    Kinte. He had been brought to the village in The Gambia and introduced to
    the griots, the elders who preserved the tribal memory. When he spoke the
    name Kunta Kinte, the griots became very excited, and they told Haley how,
    over two hundred years earlier, Kunta Kinte had gone into the forest to
    gather foodstuffs, and was seized and carried off by slave traders. This
    knowledge gave me a greater appreciation for the value of Israel's oral
    history, and the recognition that more history may lie behind so many of the
    narratives crafted from oral tradition than some biblical scholars have
    supposed.

         Another was reading how the American historian Francis Parkman
    researched the history of the Jesuit missionaries in North America in the
    19th century. Parkman retraced the voyages of the fathers in Ontario and
    the Great Lakes, canoed up the same rivers and camped at the same camp
    sites. So, when he described the beds of pine needles gathered up from the
    forest floor, the moonlight filtering through the trees, the shadows cast by
    the campfire, and the sounds of the forest's night creatures in his history,
    his imaginative recreation of the Jesuit camps was based on personal
    experience; for what he experienced must have been the same as that of the
    missionaries. Parkman's historical narration is a good example of the use
    of creative non-fiction. Perhaps the writer of the David and Goliath story
    had also visited the Valley of Elah.

         Finally, there are some eyewitness historical records that have served
    as a basis for later creative narratives. Hippolyte Delehaye, the
    Benedictine scholar who studied the lives of the saints, published a
    fascinating account in his book, _The Legends of the Saints_, of the
    martyrdom of St. Procopius (2nd cent.). We have what amounts to a
    stenographic account in Latin of Procopius' trial before a Roman magistrate.
    The account is moving in its powerful simplicity. Delehaye demonstrates how
    this account of the martyrdom was transformed later into succeeding
    legendary narratives that greatly enhanced the drama, the social station of
    Procopius, and the torture and martyrdom of this Christian witness. His
    analyses showed how even when human beings have a fairly accurate historical
    record of events in their lives, the narrative elements of the common
    pattern of a hero's story (and the early martyrs were the first Christian
    heroes) so easily interject themselves into the tradition. In the case of
    St. Procopius, the man who emerges in the later legends bears little
    resemblence to the quiet bishop who refused to give up his faith in Christ.
    Hence, when reconstructing the history of a person and his experiences using
    such legendary narratives, an understanding of literary genres and
    techniques and their interplay with historical fact is a crucial need for
    the historian.

         In the final analysis, however, I would maintain that as interesting as
    such careful analysis is, and however much insight and pleasure it might
    give the reader to know and understand the processes and techniques, it is
    the story itself in its final version that invites the reader into its world
    of meanings in order to understand and appreciate the truth(s) that the
    story is proclaiming or implying. For the ancient Hebrews, as for us who
    read and interpret his story through the eyes of faith, this and all the
    other stories of King David invite us (as they have thousands of preachers)
    to find meaning and truth that goes beyond the historical elements embedded
    in David's story.

    Grace and peace,
    Bob Schneider

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "george murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
    To: "Robert Schneider" <rjschn39@bellsouth.net>
    Cc: <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Sunday, June 23, 2002 6:35 AM
    Subject: Re: Creative spiritual non-fiction (WasHistorical accuracy?)

    > Robert Schneider wrote:
    >
    > > Bob DeHaan writes:
    > >
    > > > There is a new genre arising among Christian authors called "creative
    > > > spiritual nonfiction." It is nonfiction because it has a historical
    > > basis;
    > > > it is based on fact, not pure imagination. It is creative because it
    > > allows
    > > > the author to deal with the facts of the case in a creative way,
    using
    > > > his/her imagination. It is spiritual, rather than purely
    naturalistic, in
    > > > that it allows the author to add a spiritual dimension or
    interpretation
    > > to
    > > > both facts and imagination.
    > > >
    > > > The authors of the gospels and other parts of the Bible seemed to
    have
    > > > discovered this genre long before modern Christians writers
    reinvented it.
    > > >
    > > > Perhaps all nonscientific writers use the three elements of this
    genre in
    > > > varying proportions.
    > > >
    > > > Bob
    > > >
    > > Bob's note has stirred a couple of thoughts. I agree with him
    entirely
    > > that biblical writers combined historical tradition (the factual
    dimension)
    > > with creative imagination and spiritual interpretation, and that this
    > > quality of story-telling is universal and perhaps even an "innate"
    > > characteristic of human communication. Two OT events come to mind. One
    is
    > > the story of David and Goliath in I Sam. 17. Anyone who has studied
    > > literary genres will recognize the numerous folktale elements in the
    story,
    > > and it is these elements that give the story interest and delightfulness
    and
    > > make it memorable.
    >
    > I agree with the basic point here: The story is clearly concerned
    with
    > more than just historical report. But there are at least a couple of
    features
    > which, wihile quite possibly historical, are very foreign to our way of
    thinking.
    >
    > 1) Challenges like those of Goliath and single combat "between
    the
    > armies" was a fairly common feature of battles in the ancient world: This
    > particular folktale element has its origin in real happenings of that
    sort. (&
    > even in the 19th century we could note Bill Cody & Yellowhand.) But of
    course
    > it's highly unlikely today.
    > 2) As presented in Sunday School we think of David as a little
    kid with
    > a child's rubberband slingshot. But trained slingers could be a major
    force in
    > ancient armies & could be lethal: The Romans had auxiliaries from the
    Balearic
    > Islands with this skill.
    >
    > Shalom,
    >
    > George
    >
    > George L. Murphy
    > http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
    > "The Science-Theology Interface"
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 24 2002 - 01:09:49 EDT