Re: Noah's Flood Hypothesis May Not Hold Water

From: Jim Eisele (jeisele@starpower.net)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 09:00:47 EDT

Next message: Jan de Koning: "Re: Scholasticism dishonors Christ"

Previous message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Scholasticism dishonors Christ"
Maybe in reply to: Dale K Stalnaker: "Noah's Flood Hypothesis May Not Hold Water"
Next in thread: Glenn Morton: "RE: Noah's Flood Hypothesis May Not Hold Water"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dale writes

>This is a refutation of the idea that Noah's flood was caused by a rapid
>infilling of the Black Sea by the Mediterranean about 10000 years ago. The
>filling was much more gradual.

Of course, I agree.

All of my research points to Noah's flood being a Mesopotamian
event around 2450 BC. I don't pretend that my research is complete.

But, it is supported by the Bible and (so far as I can tell)
archaelogy and history.

Sorry, Glenn :-).

Jim

Next message: Jan de Koning: "Re: Scholasticism dishonors Christ"
Previous message: MikeSatterlee@cs.com: "Re: Scholasticism dishonors Christ"
Maybe in reply to: Dale K Stalnaker: "Noah's Flood Hypothesis May Not Hold Water"
Next in thread: Glenn Morton: "RE: Noah's Flood Hypothesis May Not Hold Water"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jun 17 2002 - 13:02:10 EDT