Re: [Fwd: Griffin #2]

From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@novagate.com)
Date: Wed May 30 2001 - 08:35:51 EDT

  • Next message: Joel Cannon: "evolution undercutting faith"

    John & Jon have been talking about the proper category label for human
    decision-making. It's not "natural" in the same sense that the growth of a
    tree is. Neither is it "natural" in the same sense as the particular outcome
    of a quantum event or a chaotic process is. And, of course, neither is it a
    wholly "divine" action.

    Is it "supernatural"? I (and I presume Griffin also) would strongly object
    to using that term here because it has such a long tradition of association
    with a particular type of _divine_ action (the kind that breaks the
    continuity of the universe's causal nexus).

    So, what's the distinction we're looking for? In the context of our
    examination of the relative merits of naturalism(ns), naturalism(sam),
    theism, process theology, deism, atheism, supernaturalism, interventionism,
    supernatural interruptionism, and the like, It seems to me that some of the
    central questions we are asking are these:

    (1) When looking at the outcome of some process or event, is the cause of
    this outcome divine action, creaturely action, or some combination of the
    two?

    (2) And if divine action is a causal factor, does it function coercively by
    overpowering creaturely action? Or, on the other hand, does it function
    non-coercively (say as a "persuasion," or an "invitation," to use the
    vocabulary of process theology) without breaking the continuity of the
    universe's causal nexus to bring about one possible outcome rather than some
    other outcome permitted by the creaturely system of cause and effect?

    (3) Does divine action function substitutionally by compensating for missing
    creaturely capabilities? Or, does divine action function at a wholly
    different level from creaturely action -- neither overpowering it, nor
    substituting for it, but sustaining the being of the creaturely system and
    "inviting & blessing" one course of creaturely action over some other
    possible course?

    Although human decision-making may be neither "natural" (in the senses noted
    above) nor divine, it is fully a creaturely action. Perhaps the distinction
    between "divine" and "creaturely" action would be more fruitful than the one
    between natural and non-natural (or supernatural, or extra-natural).

    Howard Van Till



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 30 2001 - 08:43:28 EDT