On Thu, 24 May 2001 23:57:32 EDT SteamDoc@aol.com writes:
> If evolution is being used in that manner (which I would agree that it
is,
> though probably not to the extent Bill Payne would say it is), should
not our
> primary call be to oppose this *misuse* of the science? The only
motivation
> for opposing the science itself should be if the science is not true,
which
> is not the motivation Bill states.
Sorry, guess I lost something here. What is the motivation I stated?
Bill
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun May 27 2001 - 23:52:29 EDT