Re: [Fwd: Griffin #2]

From: Jonathan Clarke (jdac@alphalink.com.au)
Date: Fri May 25 2001 - 19:09:54 EDT

  • Next message: george murphy: "Re: [Fwd: Griffin #2]"

    Hi John

    Just a couple of brief comments.

    John W Burgeson wrote:

    > Jon posted, in part: "However, I think there is a need for a word to
    > describe specific actions by God in the world contrary to creaturely
    > processes. Bill Payne's favourite is the floating axe head, another
    > would be the resurrection of Jesus. Any suggestions?"
    >
    > My own favorite is the Cana wedding event. To answer your question, I use
    > "supernatural" for such actions. In that sense, I also use "supernatural"
    > to describe what I do when I perceive two or more courses of action I
    > maight take, and decide among them, and do one of them. If I did not
    > assume this, I would have to assume determinism, absence of free will,
    > etc.
    >

    Not sure what you mean on this. Are you saying that the ability to perceive
    different courses of actions and chose between them is supernatural?

    >
    > Of course, if demons ar such exist (I have my doubts), they would also be
    > capable of s/n actions.

    I am not quite a sceptical as you on this one!

    >
    >
    > I define a s/n action as breaking into the causal chain of events by some
    > intelligent agent.
    >
    > I don't have any particular word to distinguish betwwen the category of
    > agent. Perhaps we could just use the terms:
    >
    > s/n(g)
    > s/n(h)
    > s/n(o)
    >
    > as standing for supernatural intervention by God, a human or "other."
    > s/n(o) would have to have subcategories, perhaps.
    >

    This is interesting. So you consider mind as not "natural"?

    >
    > Burgy (John Burgeson)
    >
    > www.burgy.50megs.com

    GB

    Jon



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 25 2001 - 19:02:41 EDT