-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
attached mail follows:
========================================================== Note: The original target post to which this thread refers may be seen at:
http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/godinthebox.html ==========================================================
Mark G wrote: > > I can't speak for factor analysis, but he sure is misguided when it comes to > embryology. > > Mark G.
[Hammond] Yeah, well that's the trouble Mark, and why i won't bother talking to a PhD in Biology like you. Fact is, you can attack Einstein's theory of Gravity by analyzing the standard deviation in the measurements of the bending of starlight and show that they are barely sufficient to prove it. You can even argue that the advance of the perihelion of Mercury is suspect since it's only 43 acrcseconds per century by Relativity, but there are 750 arcseconds per century caused by other effects that have to be accounted for first. many fanatics are engaged in this kind kind of activity, and that's what you want to occupy your time with vis a vis the scientific proof of God. Fact is, it is only someone who can TOTALLY COMPREHEND the theory of relativity in all it's details, who can see that there is virtually NO CHANCE that Einstein is incorrect. therefore, the OVERWHELMING convergence of proof and theory is what proves Einstein, and then consequently proves that he's right about starlight and mercury. Same is true of HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD. You are not qualified to comprehend the entire theory because you know no psychometry, Factor Analysis, or Physics. Therefore you are like the fanatics described above attacking the GREAT WALL of Einstein's theory. they are wrong and you are wrong. And I'm not about to waste my time sitting down and chatting biology with someone like you who is wrong, is unable to see why, and can't contribute anything to the theory anyway. Fact is, the theory confirms absolutely and overwhelmingly that:
"The body plan of all living things are identical, and in fact it is 3-axis Cartesian geometrically. Moreover, this geometry originates Biologically in the first 3-orthogonal Cartesian cleavages of the Egg itself".
(Hammond 1994, peer rev. literature)
Now, you can CONFIRM this by a long and tedious survey of the monumental literature on Embryology and development, but you would never DISCOVER it that way, just like you would never discover the bending of starlight without Einstein's theory (until many decades later). Same is true with Hammond's scientific proof of God. That makes the above discovery immediately apparent and vindicates Roux and Owen at last, but you wouldn't be able to do it without Hammond's theory. Now, you don't understand Hammond's theory, so I'm not going to waste my time sitting here arguing with you. i'm much better off talking to torch wielding mobs of religious Fundamentalists who are much more interested in "immediate affirmative action".
-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 24 2001 - 05:07:10 EDT