Re: [Fwd: Just a short comment on Factor Analysis, and on God...]

From: George Hammond (ghammond@mediaone.net)
Date: Tue May 22 2001 - 23:05:51 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "New fossil findings"

    Lucy Masters wrote:
    >
    > Hammond wrote:
    >
    > Psychometry does not detect "ideas" nor does it detect "beliefs"
    > nor does it detect "spirituality". You must think science is
    > stupid. We don't think so.
    >
    > We who - Kimo Sabe? Exactly how many people do live in your head?

    [Hammond]
    Umm, Ms. Masters, there have already been several complaints about
    rudeness and ad hominem attack on this list, concerning people who
    have nothing of on-topic content to say, but whom would like to engage
    in Internet reply button pushing merely to call people names. You have
    now called me "insane" several times. I don't think people on this
    list are entertained by such commentary which contains no on-topic
    content.
      BTW, "we" refers to me and the two accredited Universities in
    Massachusetts
    who certified me as a Bachelor and Master of Theoretical Physics. To
    say nothing of the 4 professorial ranked reviewers who published my
    peer reviewed paper on the subject.
      You are not permitted to debate with me using insult and ad hominem
    attact as substitues for on-topic commentary. If you are in fact
    unqualified to make a comment, then it is your responsibility to
    simply grin and bear it like the rest of us.

    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Subject: Re: Just a short comment on Factor Analysis, and on God...
    > Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:03:27 -0400
    > From: George Hammond <ghammond@mediaone.net>
    > To: americanscientificaffiliation <asa@calvin.edu>
    > References: <005401c0e2df$683ebba0$7a1e1498@alex.uncwil.edu>
    >
    > Moorad Alexanian wrote:
    > >
    > > >>===== Original Message From George Hammond <ghammond@mediaone.net> =====
    > > >Moorad Alexanian wrote:
    > > >>
    > > >> The whole thing of a scientific proof of God is pure nonsense.
    > > >
    > > >[Hammond]
    > > >May we have your CV in Science, Psychometry and Religion please?
    > > >Degrees, peer reviewed papers?
    > >
    > > [Moorad]
    > > Why must I have a degree in religion and psychometry? I thought we were
    > > discussing a scientific proof of God? Surely, religion is not science.
    > > Science is based on non-human measuring devices.
    > >
    > > >
    > > >> It can only
    > > >> be true if one has a highly skewed understanding of what science is. The
    > > >> data for science is obtained by means of devices that are mechanical,
    > > >> electrical, nuclear, etc. Where is the scientific data that proves the
    > > >> existence of God?
    > > >
    > > >[Hammond]
    > > >The variation in human ability to perceive reality, as
    > > >measured by Psychometry, IS A DIRECT SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENT
    > > >OF GOD, as proven by Hammond's discovery.
    > > > Some people are closer to "absolute reality" than others,
    > > >and human developmental growth is the mediating variable.
    > > >In the case of Mental Retardation, or 3rd World Starvation
    > > >Growth Stunting this is obvious. Less obvious, is the fact
    > > >that normal people have a variation in percentage of normal
    > > >growth. This is "God", well known to authorities throughout
    > > >history, and now is measured and proven by Hammond's discovery.
    > > >Amateurs in Science and Theology are certainly entitled to
    > > >inquire about it, but hardly qualified to challenge it without
    > > >the necessary professional qualifications. Sorry.
    > >
    > > [Moorad]
    > > The detection of God or the spiritual by man is not a proof of the existence
    > > neither of God nor of the spiritual. It is biblical reveled truth that gives
    > > support to such detections. People can conceive of the non-existing. Does
    > > that mean that whatever man thinks, exists?
    >
    > [Hammond]
    > This display of juvenile incomprehension is truly remarkable
    > considering it is coming from a full grown man. There is nothing
    > more awesome or fearful in the world than facing a full grown
    > man blinded and enraged by by incomprehension... about as fearful
    > as watching an enraged Bull in the arena being jabbed by the
    > peccadilloes of the Matador. Jesus is the only person we know of who
    > could actually do it, but I a humble scientist will give it my best
    > shot.
    > Psychometry does not detect "ideas" nor does it detect "beliefs"
    > nor does it detect "spirituality". You must think science is
    > stupid. We don't think so.
    > What Psychometry is measuring is "human physical reality".
    > It detects and measures what "your physical reality", and my reality,
    > and other individuals actual physical realities are. No two
    > people see the same thing... every person is living in a different
    > physical reality, or put more accurately, every person sees
    > absolute reality in differing degrees. We call this difference,
    > "God".
    > What you don't seem to realize is that God controls physical reality,
    > i.e. it controls your reality, my reality, their reality.
    > Therefore, the eigenvectors extracted from a correlation matrix of
    > perceptual measurements, IS A PHYSICAL MEASUREMENT OF GOD.
    > Try to rise above the superstitious for a minute, and consider
    > the following analogy:
    >
    > Rubber telescope analogy of "God"
    >
    > Suppose you were looking through a telescope
    > at the World, and suppose that the telescope had clear rubber
    > lenses it.. say made out of that crystal clear "superball"
    > rubber that the kids play with.
    > Now suppose, unbeknownst to you, someone
    > actually squeezed the telescope while you were looking through
    > it, and you didn't know it. What you would see is the entire
    > world "miraculously" getting bigger and smaller.
    > This it turns out is an accurate model of the
    > scientific explanation of God. Modern science has discovered
    > that our brains are not completely grown, this is known as the
    > "Secular Trend" in human growth.
    > Secondly, studies of 3rd world Malnutrition
    > Growth Stunting (and a bazillion other scientific studies) confirms
    > that if your brain fails to reach full growth, it impacts your
    > intelligence (IQ) dramatically, and also your personality. IQ
    > is known to be "mental speed", therefore a less than fully grown person
    > sees a world that is moving much faster than ours. It also looks
    > bigger. We hardly need Psychometry to prove this, it has been known
    > since ancient times, which is how the authorities figured out what
    > God is thousands of years before science could find a way to measure
    > it. The Pharaoh of Egypt, or Moses, certainly knew that a strapping
    > fully grown robust man could "more accurately see reality" than a
    > 98 pound weakling who never got enough to eat. You don't need to
    > test him, you can merely listen to him talk, watch him walk across
    > the street through traffic, and it immediately becomes apparent that
    > 20% of his brain is missing. You don't have to go any further than the
    > local Dunkin Donuts coffee shop and take a look at the street bums
    > hanging around outside chain smoking cigarettes to see what's
    > wrong with them... poor growth development. these people are
    > San Paku, the children of God.
    > OK, the next scientific fact is, that unlike the rest of the body,
    > the brain never stops growing. Dendrites can continue to spread inn
    > the brain, some of these bums can actually increase their intelligence
    > and reality contact. Moreover, sometimes this growth can lie dormant
    > for years because of psychological blocking or repression. then,
    > suddenly one day, after a friendly talk with the Police Chief, or
    > maybe a psychiatrist or a social worker, or maybe through personal
    > rehabilitation, BOOM, 5, 10 or 20 years of latent braingrowth
    > suddenly comes on line, and the guy sees the "whole world" suddenly
    > change in front of his eyes. This is what the Bible calls a
    > "miracle", a "miraculous act of God". suddenly everybody looks
    > SMALLER, and they seem to be moving SLOWER. His former foes and
    > adversaries now seem as harmless fools before his eyes. he has been
    > liberated by a miraculous act of God. And that sir, is what the
    > Bible is all about.
    > So, this "miraculous change in the world" is simply God squeezing
    > the human brain (or actually unsqueezing it in this case), just like
    > the prankster squeezing and unsqueezing the rubber lens in your
    > telescope. Science of course, would simply measure the diameter of
    > the rubber lens in the case of the telescope. In the case of
    > HUMAN BEINGS, science measures IQ and Personality dimensions such
    > as E,N,P. these are perceptual eigenvectors extracted by a computer from
    > huge experimental correlation matrices on people.
    > Yes Sir, science has a physical apparatus which can "physically
    > measure God". And you are about to learn all about it,
    > you and the rest of the world. The scientific proof of God
    > has been found.
    >
    > --
    > BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW:
    > -----------------------------------------------------------
    > George Hammond, M.S. Physics
    > Email: ghammond@mediaone.net
    > Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
    > -----------------------------------------------------------

    -- 
    BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW:
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    George Hammond, M.S. Physics
    Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net
    Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html
    -----------------------------------------------------------
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 22 2001 - 22:57:29 EDT