Moorad Alexanian wrote:
>
> >>===== Original Message From George Hammond <ghammond@mediaone.net> =====
> >Moorad Alexanian wrote:
> >>
> >> The whole thing of a scientific proof of God is pure nonsense.
> >
> >[Hammond]
> >May we have your CV in Science, Psychometry and Religion please?
> >Degrees, peer reviewed papers?
>
> [Moorad]
> Why must I have a degree in religion and psychometry? I thought we were
> discussing a scientific proof of God? Surely, religion is not science.
> Science is based on non-human measuring devices.
>
> >
> >> It can only
> >> be true if one has a highly skewed understanding of what science is. The
> >> data for science is obtained by means of devices that are mechanical,
> >> electrical, nuclear, etc. Where is the scientific data that proves the
> >> existence of God?
> >
> >[Hammond]
> >The variation in human ability to perceive reality, as
> >measured by Psychometry, IS A DIRECT SCIENTIFIC MEASUREMENT
> >OF GOD, as proven by Hammond's discovery.
> > Some people are closer to "absolute reality" than others,
> >and human developmental growth is the mediating variable.
> >In the case of Mental Retardation, or 3rd World Starvation
> >Growth Stunting this is obvious. Less obvious, is the fact
> >that normal people have a variation in percentage of normal
> >growth. This is "God", well known to authorities throughout
> >history, and now is measured and proven by Hammond's discovery.
> >Amateurs in Science and Theology are certainly entitled to
> >inquire about it, but hardly qualified to challenge it without
> >the necessary professional qualifications. Sorry.
>
> [Moorad]
> The detection of God or the spiritual by man is not a proof of the existence
> neither of God nor of the spiritual.
[Hammond]
We are not talking about "detection of the Spiritual", that is
only a PRESUMPTION of yours. What we are actually detecting
is your ability to "see reality". This is explained ad nauseum
in my last post to you. God has the power to alter your
"perception of Reality", and that can be measured by psychometry.
I shall not repeat it all over again.
> It is biblical reveled truth that gives
> support to such detections.
[Hammond]
Yes, the Bible is the historical record of Man's "qualitative"
detection of the existence of God. Now however, science has
detected it "quantitatively", and we therefore assert that
we have found a "scientific proof of God". It's all quite
simple actually. I have run into high school graduates
with unfettered minds and sheer energy and enthusiasm who
have understood it in less than 45 minutes. It is however,
difficult to teach old dogs new tricks.
> People can conceive of the non-existing.
[Hammond]
That's your opinion. I don't think you can
prove that.
Does
> that mean that whatever man thinks, exists?
[Hammond]
That's quite irrelevant given the above fact.
> [Moorad]
> Scientific laws are cast in mathematical forms and the logic of mathematics
> allows rigorous derivations from mathematically based scientific theories.
> Mathematical proofs are the prototype of logical thinking. You must use
> them to prove anything.
[Hammond]
Mathematics is merely "symbolic language", anything expressed
in mathematics can be expressed in words. Thus when Man discovered
how to speak, mathematics was born. If we presume the intrinsic
validity of language (in the present case the word of God), then
we must presume the validity of mathematics. Ergo, mathematics can
confirm the word of God. That should give you something to
respond to, if nothing else.
-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 22 2001 - 22:47:58 EDT