Terry M. Gray wrote:
>
> I'm curious why Hammond gets blasted for not being uniquely "Christian" but
> the ID folks (with their unidentified designer and their "big tent" of
> supporters) or the YEC folks (whose entire story can be readily transported
> into Islamic fundamentalism) don't.
>
> I realized that some have previously pointed out some of the weakness wrt ID.
>
> How about if we turn this discussion toward the more apologetic and
> theological bent (where perhaps more people can participate intelligently)
> and ask whether a natuiral theology is Biblical and what role natural
> theology should play in our apologetics.
>
> TG
[Hammond]
This is a "science and religion" discussion group. As long
as "apologetic and theological" discussion contains at least
SOME MINIMAL REFERENCE TO SCIENCE and is not completely "doctrinal"
I would think it would be within the charter of the group.
>
> _________________
> Terry M. Gray, Ph.D., Computer Support Scientist
> Chemistry Department, Colorado State University
> Fort Collins, Colorado 80523
> grayt@lamar.colostate.edu http://www.chm.colostate.edu/~grayt/
> phone: 970-491-7003 fax: 970-491-1801
-- BE SURE TO VISIT MY WEBSITE, BELOW: ----------------------------------------------------------- George Hammond, M.S. Physics Email: ghammond@mediaone.net Website: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html -----------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 21 2001 - 19:13:59 EDT