In a message dated 5/2/01 7:19:08 AM Mountain Standard Time,
hvantill@novagate.com [responding to Bob] writes:
<< Sorry, but I find this last statement very confusing. It sounds like things
are done _either_ by ID _or_ by evolution. Is that what you meant? Would it
be the case, then, that a designed universe would not be capable of
actualizing certain potential forms, or that a non-designed universe would
be capable of supporting evolution?
>>
If IDers insist on the either/or situation, then doesn't ID equate to a
"deism-of-the-gaps"? [Which is essentially what both Christian and
naturalistic critics of Paley realized in the 19th century.]
Karl
*****************************
Karl V. Evans
cmekve@aol.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 02 2001 - 20:54:54 EDT