Re: Methodological Naturalism

From: John W Burgeson (burgytwo@juno.com)
Date: Wed May 02 2001 - 15:58:46 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Methodological Naturalism"

    Larry also wrote:

    "Meanwhile, let's get to the battle you mention, of changing the ruling
    paradigm in present-world academia, the often underlying assumption that
    God is
    either nonexistent, or unemployed. ..."

    Not having been in academia since graduate school, I find it difficult to
    comment on what you say is a "ruling paradigm." Those people I know in
    academia are, AFAIK, all Christians or Jews. But I know only a small set,
    hardly randomly selected.

    I do recall a 1916 survey of scientists in which 42% said they thought a
    personal God did exist and that they had some expectations of answered
    prayer. That survey was replicated a few years ago and the percentage
    then was 37%. While that may indicate some fallout (or may be within
    reasonable error bounds), it does not support your claim of "ruling
    paradigm."

    Perhaps others from academia on this LISTSERV would like to comment?

    Burgy (John Burgeson)

    www.burgy.50megs.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 02 2001 - 16:16:08 EDT