Dick Fischer wrote:
> I am planning on submitting a series of two articles to PSCF with the
> working title, "Young-Earth Creationism: A Literal Mistake, Parts I
> and II" What I try to show is that if Genesis and the Old Testament
> is taken literally, the YEC apologetic is still dead in the water even
> if we ignored its wretched science. Anyone who would care to give me
> some criticism or constructive feedback, I would be happy to email you
> the proposed articles as Word attachments.
I have little hope that my advice will be followed but will
express it anyway: Those who are concerned about ASA being a
significant factor in serious science-theology discussions should avoid
putting anything at all about YEC claims, pro or con, in PSCF. The same
is true, for that matter, of all concordist discussions of Gen.1-3.
When many people see these debates going on in such a journal at the
beginning of the 21st century they conclude that the organization whoich
publishes it is hopelessly antiquated & not worth being involved with.
Shalom,
George
George L. Murphy
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
"The Science-Theology Dialogue"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Apr 07 2001 - 06:55:15 EDT