Re: Numerics and Applied Apologetics

From: gordon brown (gbrown@euclid.Colorado.EDU)
Date: Sun Apr 30 2000 - 14:49:25 EDT

  • Next message: Steve Petermann: "Re: A response to Maatman with transcript"

    Vernon,

    I need to make a correction to my posting of yesterday. I think I
    misplaced a decimal point. I should have estimated the probability that a
    seven-word set with numerical value divisible by 37 could be broken up
    into four disjoint subsets with this property as being 0.7% rather than
    7%. It would actually be a little less than this since I didn't take into
    account that sometimes such a set can have more than one such
    decomposition. If probability or combinatorics were my field, I would
    probably give you an exact figure. Anyhow, it appears that the frequency
    of such strings of words is only about a tenth of what I indicated in the
    earlier post. I would add one more thing. The probability that a string
    with a 3,2,1,1-decomposition as in Gen. 1:1 would have another
    decomposition of this type is nearly 1 in 6.

    Gordon Brown
    Department of Mathematics
    University of Colorado
    Boulder, CO 80309-0395



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 14:49:30 EDT