Re: Daniel's 70 `weeks' #1A (was How to prove supernaturalism?)

From: AutismUK@aol.com
Date: Fri Dec 22 2000 - 10:19:36 EST

  • Next message: Bertvan@aol.com: "Methods of quantifying affect"

    In a message dated 20/12/00 23:02:07 GMT Standard Time, sejones@iinet.net.au
    writes:

    > In that sense, Paul is perfectly and literally sincere when he says: " to
    be
    > honest". Paul is indeed "honest" within the metaphysical framework of his
    > anti-supernaturalistic philosophy. But if Jesus is the Messiah, then
    Paul's
    > anti-supernaturalistic philosophy is simply *WRONG*!

    I despair.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 22 2000 - 10:20:59 EST