----- Original Message -----
From: <Bertvan@aol.com>
To: ccogan@telepath.com (Chris Cogan)
Bertvan:
Hi Chris. I don't like to appear to I ignore you. Your arguments are
always elaborate and well thought out, but our premises are so different
that discussion would be difficult.
Silk here: Why don't you guys take your gobblydegook on the road? In your
juvenile & ever so desperate attempts to come off as "in the know" you
simply make fools of yourselves!
No offense intended by why can't you simply state your case simply? Why the
riddles & double negatives? Why the laborius attempts at complication? Are
you giving eachother a course & if so what is the course on? "I know more
than you"????????? I could take the amount of actual "useful information &
thus knowledge" passed on by the both of you & put it in a thimble & there'd
still be room for a rattle. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing as you
two so
amply demonstrate! An intelligent individual can explain complications
simply. A "show off" with a deep sense of inadequacy that demands to be
filled just can't! I am of the opinion that the purpose of this list is to
learn & share knowledge & certainly not "obfuscation" for self -
serving reasons! Perhaps Occams Razor had guys like you in mind! chao/silk
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 28 2000 - 13:50:40 EST