In a message dated 11/7/00 8:18:53 PM Eastern Standard Time,
sejones@iinet.net.au writes:
<< This is even more significant considering that as Scott L. Page Ph.D
(Anatomy & Cell Biology), Huxter probably has the highest biological
qualifications on this List, yet he hardly ever argues his case on
scientific
grounds but relies mostly on crude ad hominems. Why?
Steve >>
Simply enough, even for YOU, Steve. I have tried on many occasins to provide
you with documentation supportive of my claims. You ignore it; claim it was
not exactly what yuo wanted; and immediately launch into your 'Oh, he's just
trying to put down the layman' pity ploy. It gets tiresome. Example:
=====================================
SJ>But if Huxter knows of any molecular clock studies based on "nuclear DNA
>mutation rates", perhaps he can post it to the List?
HX>Sure Steve. Why, doing a simple medline search produced 8 hits on
Primates
>alone. A sampling:
[...][Here, Steve opted to delete the several examples of the eight papers I
had provided]
Thanks to Huxter, but what I mean was post the *details*, in particular
how it relates to the article I posted about mtDNA's clock.
=================================
So, it appears that unless we can read Steve's mind and provide him with
exactly what he wants - NOT what he actually writes - he will simply ignore
it or blow it off as he did here. After a few ropunds of garbage like this,
and of course Steve's frequent ad hominems (inferring that if I were a *real*
scientist, I would just write page after page of facts for Steve to pick
through and, were he to live up to his usual reputation, merely reject tham
all. But at least I would have been 'nice.' Sorry - that, too, gets rapidly
tiresome. Scott L. Page, Ph.D., simply got sick of Steve Jones, freshman
student and blinder-wearing ID advocate/creationist ignoring his explanations
and offers to provide additional information.
And while I am sure everyone is impressed that Steve can paste quotes from
creationists pointing out the 'flaws' in everyone else's arguments, they mean
nothing. Orwellian spin-control does not surpass reality in anyone's book.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 18 2000 - 12:25:34 EST