Re: chance and selection

From: Ralph Krumdieck (ralphkru@OREGON.UOREGON.EDU)
Date: Fri Nov 17 2000 - 14:27:33 EST

  • Next message: bill r wald: "Re: ID and Creationism"

    >
    >Ralph:
    > >It's a good thing that the IDers are polite and never question other
    > >people's intelligence, as you have repeatedly pointed out, Bertvan.
    > >Otherwise, I might have misconstrued your message.
    > >ralph
    >
    >Bertvan
    >You are absolutely right, Ralph, and I stand chastised. It is wrong to make
    >fun of anyone's beliefs, whether it be that life and the universe was
    >created by fairies, Gods, a giant cosmic fluctuation, or by chance and
    >selection. Especially, since I can't decisively dispute any of them. If one
    >of the above is your belief and I have offended, I apologize. Gods, fairies
    >and cosmic fluctuations would be impossible to disprove, but the obvious
    >intelligence that is becoming more and more apparent as we understand life
    >processes makes the chance and selection idea seem far-fetched.
    >Nevertheless, there is no reason to ridicule any unfalsifiable belief which
    >is dear to someone's heart.

    No, you haven't offended me, Bertvan. I just saw you trashing your own
    views and thought I would draw it to your attention. I don't have a belief
    in any of the list of agents you mentioned. I'm just trying to follow the
    evidence. Of course, so is everyone else! We all end up in so many
    different places, we must be really bad at this. :)
    ralph



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 17 2000 - 14:27:44 EST