RE: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics

From: Nelson Alonso (nalonso@ecal.com)
Date: Wed Nov 08 2000 - 22:36:28 EST

  • Next message: David_Bowman@georgetowncollege.edu: "Re: Phil Johnson on the Second Law of Thermodynamics"

    >>Richard Wein: Stephen's basic error is to confuse the Second Law of
    Thermodynamics with the Creationist Law of Thermodynamics.

    >>>DNAunion; No, Richard's basic error is to confuse the Second Law of
     Thermodynamics with his prejudiced, preconceived notions of a Creationist
    Law
     of Thermodynamics.

    >>>Nelson:What is the creationist law of thermodynamics?

    DNAunion: There is none. Richard was being "humorous". The implication is
    that "our" version of thermodynamics is that "order never comes from
    disorder" (as Paul posted), or that "evolution violates thermodynamics".
    However, anyone who has followed the discussions here will see that NEITHER
    SEJones nor I propose either of these.

    Nelson:
    I have found that most of these debates are really people talking past
    eachother.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 08 2000 - 22:35:22 EST