Re: IDer's ad hominems against evolutionist disassociated from (CSI, GAs, etc.)

From: Stephen E. Jones (sejones@iinet.net.au)
Date: Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:55:39 EDT

  • Next message: DNAunion@aol.com: "Re: WHY DOES THE UNIVERSE WORK"

    Reflectorites

    On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:35:47 EDT, DNAunion@aol.com wrote:

    [...]

    DU>PS: I don't blame Steven for "disassociating" with my ad homs.
    >
    >I just think people here should understand that FROM DAY ONE, I have been
    >insulted or accused of wrongdoing by anti-IDists - yes, *before* I did
    >anything of the sort to them.

    [...]

    Welcome to the club DNA! Those evolutionists (i.e. not all) who would
    rather insult and intimidate than discuss, either they don't know any better
    or it is their *tactics* to try to drag IDers down to their level.

    My recommendation is not to bite and in the end they look bad. There are a
    lot of uncommitted lurkers on this List and they can see which side
    presents the evidence and which side mostly just insults and intimidates.

    I am sure they will draw the conclusion that I originally did when I first
    joined in 1995 that if the evolutionist side had the answers they would
    use them rather than personal abuse.

    Steve

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "In the final analysis, it is not any specific scientific evidence that convinces
    me that Darwinism is a pseudoscience that will collapse once it becomes
    possible for critics to get a fair hearing. It is the way the Darwinists argue
    their case that makes it apparent that they are afraid to encounter the best
    arguments against their theory. A real science does not employ propaganda
    and legal barriers to prevent relevant questions from being asked, nor does
    it rely on enforcing rules of reasoning that allow no alternative to the
    official story. If the Darwinists had a good case to make, they would
    welcome the critics to an academic forum for open debate, and they would
    want to confront the best critical arguments rather than to caricature them
    as straw men. Instead they have chosen to rely on the dishonorable
    methods of power politics." (Johnson P.E., "The Wedge of Truth: Splitting
    the Foundations of Naturalism," Intervarsity Press: Downers Grove IL.,
    2000, p.141)
    Stephen E. Jones | Ph. +61 8 9448 7439 | http://www.iinet.net.au/~sejones
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Oct 21 2000 - 02:53:29 EDT