Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh...

From: Chris Cogan (ccogan@telepath.com)
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:31:12 EDT

  • Next message: Chris Cogan: "Re: Plonk"

    >
    > > >Richard Wein: Unfortunately, some of your recent posts, including this
    > > one,
    > > have shown that you're just as illogical as the rest of them.
    > >
    > > DNAunion: Sorry if I helped point out your error - no need to get nasty.
    > >
    >
    >Does that strike anyone else as somewhat ironic?

    Chris
    Very. Not very self-observant, is he?

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 16 2000 - 13:36:24 EDT