Plonk

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:23:06 EDT

Next message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion)"

Previous message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh..."
Next in thread: Chris Cogan: "Re: Plonk"
Reply: Chris Cogan: "Re: Plonk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

It has been entertaining to show the problems in Intelligent Design but
DNAUnion's arguments have become mainly ad hominem, repetitive and without
any content so I have decided to kill file him. (Who was it that predicted
DNA's behavior?).

I should have done this earlier though but I am easily carried away when
given the opportunity to expose the weak arguments of ID. Back to real
science.

Next message: Huxter4441@aol.com: "Re: Plonk!(re: killfile of DNAunion)"
Previous message: FMAJ1019@aol.com: "Re: ID *does* require a designer! (but it does not need to identify who or wh..."
Next in thread: Chris Cogan: "Re: Plonk"
Reply: Chris Cogan: "Re: Plonk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 16 2000 - 11:23:26 EDT