In a message dated 10/6/2000 9:16:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
rwein@lineone.net writes:
> >You are confused, that RM*NS can be used succesfully to design things is
> not
> >evidence that ID is required for RM*NS to work. On the contrary, it shows
> >that RM*NS can be powerful algorithms that can generate CSI.
>
> Hold your horses! Until Dembski clarifies the meaning of CSI, it's not clear
> that *anything* can generate CSI.
>
> I suggest you restrict yourself to saying that RMNS can generate
> information. (But then you'd better be prepared to say what you mean by
> information.)
>
Point well taken.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 14:03:48 EDT