Re: NS and intelligent designers

From: FMAJ1019@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:51:38 EDT

  • Next message: Nucacids@aol.com: "Re: The Future for ID"

    In a message dated 10/5/2000 11:50:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
    Nucacids@aol.com writes:

    >
    > In a message dated 10/5/00 6:45:35 PM Dateline Standard Time,
    > welsberr@inia.cls.org writes:
    >
    > << My comment that by Dembski's
    > criteria, NS could be held to be an intelligent designer was
    > meant to convey to the reader the concept that Dembski's
    > argument was flawed, not that NS actually therefore *was* an
    > intelligent designer. The
    > actualization-exclusion-specification triad that Dembski
    > extols is not exclusive of natural selection. >>
    >
    > Which is probably not a problem when dealing with
    > the origin of the first cells on this planet.

    The same applies in principle to any natural pathway



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 06 2000 - 02:51:51 EDT