In a message dated 10/2/00 9:28:29 AM Central Daylight Time,
Huxter4441@aol.com writes:
>>Huxter: Be wary of imposters and posters using mulitple names to appear
to have support - nucacids and DNAunion appear to be the same person, and it
also
appears that 'Mike B. Gene' may be making a comeback under a different name.
DNAunion: Huxter is spewing nothing but unsupported "gossip". Where's your
evidence that Nucacids and I are the same person? Totally absent.
>>Huxter: The ARN discussion board was shut down in part due to the fact that
ID
advocates were posting under multiple identities ...
DNAunion: Nope, more unsupported "gossip" by Huxter. The ARN moderator
began logging IP addresses after the assertions were made and instructed
those posting that it was against the rules to post under multiple names, and
that anyone found doing so would be prevented from posted at ARN. No one was
prevented from posting there, thus, the evidence points to no one posting
under multiple names.
And even if someone were to have been doing so, that single person would have
been banned (as the trouble maker Pantrog was) - the whole board wouldn't
have been shut down (you don't think things through, do you Huxter?).
The ARN discussion forum was suspended mostly because of anti-IDists (like
"IAmNoOne") launching ad homs and making insuations of wrong doing (just like
you are now, Huxter). The ARN moderator instructued the posters to follow
the rules. The anti-IDists continued, and several of the pro-ID posters also
began posting ad homs and insinuations. Though some legitimate discussion
was still going on, the site in general had deteriorated into an "implication
or wrong doing" fest, and the ARN moderator shut the whole board down (note
that he/she did not shut down just the anti-IDists: so favoritism does not
apply).
>>Huxter: .. which, big surprise, heaped accolades on each other (which
were in fact themseves!).
DNAunion: Nope, yet more "gossip" by Huxter. I complimented Mike Gene
several times on his ability to pinpoint the flaws in his opponents'
position, and I complimented Nelson (I believe it was) for pointing out the
idiocy of someone's implication that I was a Creationist. Sorry Huxter, but
I am neither Mike Gene, Nelson, Jimmy, nor Ecko (as Pantrog and IamNoOne
incorrectly claimed at ARN), nor am I nucacids here.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 13:30:26 EDT