Stephen Jones wrote:
[...]
SJ>The fact that Susan cannot show what else an atheist can
>believe in except some form of evolution proves my point that
>"atheists have no option but to believe in some form of
>evolution".
[...]
WRE>Just because Susan didn't mention Raelianism doesn't mean that
WRE>it doesn't exist.
SJ>I note that Wesley also does not "show what else an atheist can
SJ>believe in except some form of evolution"!
SJ>Thus Wesley as well, confirms my point that "atheists have no
SJ>option but to believe in some form of evolution":
SJ>"One can be a theistic `Darwinian,' but no one can be an
SJ>atheistic "Creationist." (Wilcox D.L., in Buell J. & Hearn V., eds.,
SJ>"Darwinism: Science or Philosophy?" 1994, p.215.
SJ>http://www.leaderu.com/orgs/fte/darwinism/chapter13b.html)
<http://www.rael.org/int/english/philosophy/philosophy.html>
Raelians are anti-evolutionists, but not theists. The set of
atheist anti-evolutionist Raelians is non-empty. Stephen's
assertion is counter-factual.
Wesley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 09 2000 - 09:18:28 EDT